|
city cMany citizens appeared at Council meeting 6:00 p.m.
Monday, August 22, 2005 at City Hall. They spoke
against
Eminent Domain and Marting renovation.
Russ Cooper
- continued from from page one.
American Indian Russell Cooper had preliminary hearing at
11:20 a.m.
Monday, August 22, 2005 in Municipal Court.
Russell Cooper advised Municipal Court Judge Russell Kegley
that he
waived
preliminary hearing
and asked the Court to bind his case of
alleged
recall petition perjury to the Common
Pleas Court Grand Jury.
Mr. Cooper is represented by Attorney Eric Wrage.
According to a reporter on the scene at the hearing Monday,
August 22,
2005,
Police
Chief
Charles Horner appeared dismayed to learn that Mr.
Wrage is Russell Cooper's lawyer.
Attorney Eric Wrage and others were placed under a secret
Nazi-type
surveillance
order issued
by Chief Horner in March 2003 when Wrage,
as
Assistant County Prosecuting Attorney was
inquiring about missing
money
and other items seized in Drug Task Force raids. At
that time
Horner was Commandant of the now disbanded Drug Task
Force.
The money and missing items still have not been accounted for
by Police
Chief
Horner. Neither
Horner nor Sheriff Marty Donini have made proper
accounting
of items and money seized
in Drug Task Force raids.
The Grand Jury will hear the state's six witnesses against
Mr. Cooper.
One
of his accusers has
a six page City rap sheet and has also served a
term in state prison for breaking and entering.
Chief Horner has said there were six persons claiming forgery
of
their
signatures, (according
to a Portsmouth Daily Times article,)
but the Police have only released four of the names.
Who are the two mystery complainants? Are they
presently under
indictments
for stealing a large
sum of money from a children's recreation
program? Did Horner make a deal with two indicted
criminals to frame
an innocent man?
Russ Cooper email: CCooperStrongBow@aol.com
Read old newspaper (printed
below)
stories
that reveal
Cooper's difficulty with Solicitor David Kuhn for
robbing
Indian cemeteries. If
any reader would like to communicate
with
Russell Cooper he
gets email at CCooperStrongBow@aol.com
THE FOUR who ACCUSED Cooper are IDENTIFIED as Jeffrey
Price,
David Price, Sonya Campbell and Burt Bragdon.
Why did Chief Horner violate Russell Cooper's rights by
arresting him
without a warrant on Friday, August 12, 2005 at 10:30
a.m? The Courts
were open; a warrant could have been obtained. Why did
Chief
Horner not allow Mr. Cooper an attorney, or a hearing?
The courts
were open; Horner had Mr. Cooper at the City
Hall; Cooper had a
right
to have a hearing before the court. The Judges
were
there on
the bench, but Horner ordered Cooper taken from City
Hall to the
County
Jail and ordered him held
behind bars under a $10,000
bond?
Why
did Horner subject Mr. Cooper to
such
unconstitutional
discriminatory
abuse? The answer: Indians don't have
rights
of
our elite first-class white people and the aggressive,
abusive Horner
fully intended that Russell Cooper remain in jail until
Monday morning
before he could be freed. Police Chief Horner was
in effect not only
unlawfully arresting Cooper on a highly questionable charge
but was,
in fact, also wrongfully sentencing Cooper to three days in
jail to await
a hearing. Chief Horner did not expect his prisoner to
be able to obtain
$10,000 for a release bond on Friday afternoon. Horner
expected
Cooper
to stay in jail. Does Horner agree with ex- President
Theodore
Roosevelt who said, "The only good Indian is a
dead Indian?"
Or, is Horner simply abusive to anyone he feels he can
violate without
fear of civil suit against him and the City of
Portsmouth?
Chief Horner may be sued once again in Federal
Court for violation of
civil rights. The Chief may like
to believe Indians have no rights, and
that
victims of his
police abuse have no rights, but federal judges have
ruled against Chief Charles Horner
before.
This may prove to be another one of Horner's
many corrupt cop capers
that will cost the City of Portsmouth
plenty of big dollars in lawyer fees,
costs and damages.
Copied by
Austin Leedom Saturday, August 20, 2005… email from
CCooperStrongBow@aol.com
I thought
there was another article on the dig by Kuhn and I finally found
it.
Hope you
can use it. Let me know if you need anything I may be able to help
you with.
(June 5, 1986, June 18, 1986,
July 11, 1986)
Good
luck!!
Elmer
*******
*******
*******
The Portsmouth Daily
Times
Scioto
County's Only Daily
Newspaper,
Serving
Southern
Ohio and
Northern Kentucky
Portsmouth, Ohio
45662
Thursday, June 5, 1986
County Archeological Project
Draws Criticism
From
Indians
BY Paul
F. Nelson
Times
staff Writer
They
were neither wearing war paint nor brandishing tomahawks, but their
message was clear:
Stop the
digging!
American
Indian representatives from Akron this week let the Scioto County
Board of Commissioners
know
how they felt
about the local excavations for prehistoric Indian relics. The
digging is under
way at
former county home property on U.S. 52 west of
Portsmouth.
Meeting
with the commissioners were Cark Hosick, executive director of the
North American
Indian
Cultural Center at Akron, and Mel Fletcher,
also of Akron, who claims to be of Choctaw
descent.
Others
at the meeting included Harry Herdman. an assistant county
prosecutor, and David Kuhn,
who has
been licensed by the commissioners to dig for relics in the
area.
The
commissioners several weeks ago authorized Kuhn to do the
excavating,. with the agreement
any
relics recovered
will be displayed either, at the courthouse or at the Southern Ohio
Museum
and
Cultural Center.
Kuhn
told The Daily Times Hosick and Fletcher initially wanted all
digging stopped and any burial sites
to
remain undisturbed. They also, according to Kuhn, wanted
construction of two group homes for Scioto
Residential Services Inc.
moved to another location on the former county home
property.
"I
explained that so far we have not found anything significant and no
evidence of any burial Sites”
he
said. He said there is, however
evidence of prehistoric Indian habitation in the area including
charcoal
from campfires.
Kuhn
said he is working closely with The Ohio Historical Society's
Department of Archaeology
on the
project.
“We
finally ended up agreeing that they (Hosick and Fletcher) would pay
for the services of an
archaeologist of their choosing to come down
here to determine the extent of the prehistoric Indian
habitation of the site," he
said.
Kuhn
added, Hosick and Fletcher indicated they represented all Indians,
both living and dead.
He added
Indians have camped in protest at other archaeological diggings
where they felt the remains
of their
ancestors were being disturbed
“We plan
to continue with our excavations. I told them that if they wished,
they could send
an
observer down here to keep an eye on our
work,” Kuhn said.
“I asked
them how they could be certain there are in fact burial sites in
that area.
*******
*******
*******
-----
Original Message -----
From: Elmer Boggs
To: CCooperStrongBow@aol.com
Cc: Elmer (Kanati) Boggs
Sent: Tuesday,
August 16, 2005 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: David
Kuhn
Russ,
The
following is what I have. I thought I had another article, but will
keep looking.
I was
going to ask if we could help.
There was
a letter going around that Kuhn took some artifacts to Texas to
sell.
I don't
know who had it. I will keep looking.
Although I
don't want anything to do with Oliver, but he may have had that
letter.
Elmer
*******
*****************
The Portsmouth Daily
Times
Friday July 11, 1986
Local
Dig Unearths Ancient Remains
By Paul F.
Nelson
Indian remains, recovered
in the county and believed to date back
several thousand years,
have
been turned over to the
Ohio Historical Society for study,
The Daily Times
learned Thursday.
In a story in Wednesday's
edition, a reference was made to an earlier
statement by Dave Kuhn
that no burial sites had been found. Kuhn,
a local attorney, has
been authorized by the Scioto County Board of
Commissioners to dig on
the former county home site on U.S. 52
west of
Portsmouth.
While being interviewed
for the Wednesday story, Kuhn ,was not
asked about any burial
discoveries and did not volunteer that
information.
Thursday morning, Kuhn
admitted the remains of eight to
10 persons recently have been
discovered.
William Ogg, chairman of
the commissioners, questioned late
Thursday about the
discoveries, said he had not been aware that
any burial sites had been
located.
“I'm sorry to hear that.
I can guarantee you one thing; the remains
will not be placed on
display. They will be returned to Scioto
County and reburied at the same site with proper
ceremonial
honors. We (the commissioners) will contact the proper
people
in order that these ceremonies can be held," Ogg
said.
Several weeks ago,
"American Indian representatives from
Akron expressed
concern to the
commissioners that the digging might disturb
burial
sites.
Martha Otto, head of the
Ohio Historical Society Department of
Archeology and a frequent
participant in the local diggings, said
in a Thursday telephone
interview her department has some of the
burial
remains.
"Most of what we found
was fragmented; I don't recall seeing any
complete skulls or
skeletons," Otto said, adding the pressure of the
earth causes the bones to
break up
Asked why she had not
previously mentioned the discoveries,
Otto said, “I'm mainly interested in what these people
ate,
their plants and what
they
collected.
"All of the material,
according to our agreement with the county
commissioners, will be
kept here (in Columbus) for study for
six months and then
returned to Scioto County," Otto explained.
*******
The Columbus
Dispatch
June 18, 1986
Indians stand their ground in
battle for
ancestors
By Mike
Harden
It is an unlikely site
for a battleground, a tiny swatch of Scioto
County land ringed with foxtail and vetch, shadowed by
hickory
and oak.
A few miles west of
Portsmouth, just above the Ohio River, it is
the
former Site of a county
old folks home and the future site of a pair
of homes for the mentally retarded. But the
controversy broiling
about that small patch of real estate deals less with what
is to be
built on the land than what exists beneath
it.
The Adena Indians were
there, perhaps sometime around the birth
of Christ.
They were followed, quite
likely, by the Ft. Ancient. More recently,
it is
thought that the Shawnee
used the site. For years, the land has been
listed on the Ohio Historical Society’s inventory of
archaeological
sites, and for years it has been conventional wisdom
around
Portsmouth that
it is an area rich in Indian
artifacts.
AS RECENTLY as May,
artifacts and - so some witnesses claim -
human remains from the site were displayed at a local
exhibit by
Indian artifact collectors.
That showing did not
escape the attention of one Oliver Collins,
a 47-year old medical
supply salesman from Portsmouth, but more
important, the leader of
the Tassel Clan of Cherokee descendants.
It was Collins'
ancestors, known as the Overhill band of Cherokees,
who escaped the infamous
"Trail of Tears" expulsion to Oklahoma
by fleeing instead to
Kentucky.
Some 200 Scioto County
residents claim blood lineage to the
Cherokee and have launched a fight against Portsmouth
attorney
and amateur archaeologist David Kuhn who, with the blessing
of
Scioto County
commissioners and the Ohio
Historical Society,
is conducting a dig on
the disputed
land.
"How would you like it,"
Collins asks, "if we dug up your
grandfather to find out how tall he was, how short, what
kind of
molar damage he
had because of poor corn grinding,
what kind
of clothing he had
and jewelry? "It would be as if we
came up to
Greenlawn Cemetery
and started digging up graves.
They'd throw us
in
jail."
KUHN SEES the matter in a
different light. Of the Cherokee group,
he contends, "These
people cannot show any direct descent or cultural
affinity to these
people," to the Indians who once inhabited the
site.
When asked what the site
had yielded, Kuhn suggested that it was little
more than arrowheads,
bone tools, some artifacts, referring questions
on the issue of human
remains to Martha Otto, the Ohio Historical
Society’s curator of
archaeology. It is the society that issues permits
for archaeological
exploration and which apparently felt compelled to
ally itself with Kuhn
after Scioto County commissioners gave him
the green light to
dig.
Otto acknowledged not
only that human remains had been taken from
the site, remains which
are now in the society's possession, but
additionally, "There were
some taken out before the dig began.
"There have been people
picking up stuff from that site for years."
The Cherokee group wants
it halted. Members have written letters to
the
local paper, launched a
petition drive, solicited the aid of the American
Indian Cultural Center in
Akron. They want the human remains
returned to their burial
site. Period.
Standing in the midst of
the dig Site, Collins protested, "You tell me
this is an archaeological
dig. This is grave robbery,
defilement."
So far, the protests of
Collins and his Cherokee friends have failed to
halt the dig, but they
may recently have found an ally in
one Bill Ogg,
chairman of the Scioto
County commissioners.
SAID OGG, "We don't need
anymore Indian skulls in your house
or my house," indicating
that he supports the re-interment of the
remains once they've been
removed from the path of the bulldozers
that will excavate the
construction site.
The final resolution of
the matter remains to be seen.
Critics of the Cherokee
group would seem to suggest that these
contemporary protesters
cannot speak for the Adena and Ft. Ancient,
the Shawnee. Such logic,
applied to the clergy today would empty the
pulpits of ministers
whose legitimacy is based on a spiritual affinity
with a prophet 2,000
years dead and to whom they would have some
difficulty tracing their
lineage.
As for the Cherokee
protesters, it seems to this observer that they
are speaking out for
their long dead Indian brethren if only because
they are among the few
living people
*******
"The
whites, too shall pass - perhaps sooner than other tribes
continue
to contaminate your own bed, and you might suffocate in
your
own waste". By
Seattle
Editors Note:
Russell Cooper was one of the Indians that
were
responsible for stopping David Kuhn’s removal of
body
skeletons and artifacts from the Indian burial site at
the
old Scioto County Home site in 1986.
At
last report David Kuhn is still active in unearthing Indian
graves.
Allegedly he has gained much money from the sale of artifacts
and
body skeletons that he
has removed from Indian graves.
Clerk Joann Aeh and Solicitor David Kuhn have worked
together in past
crimes.
In
1996 Solicitor David Kuhn and Joann Aeh
conspired to
destroy petitions that had been gathered for the recall of
David Kuhn and a corrupted city
council.
Joann Aeh, David Kuhn, Jim Kalb, Ann Sydnor and
Greg
Bauer were charged with felony crimes of mutilating
election petitions after the Ohio Supreme Court ruled 7-0
against their actions.
County Prosecuting Attorney Lynn Grimshaw neglected to
bring them to court.
Grimshaw lost his office after members
of
his own party voted him out in
2004.
ARE
KUHN AND AEH NOW PLOTTING AGAINST AN
INDIAN WHO PROTESTED AGAINST THE DEFILEMENT
OF
THE INDIAN CEMETERY?
Is
it possible Solicitor David Kuhn directed City Clerk Joann
Aeh
to allege that Russell Cooper did something illegal with
the
petitions he was passing for the recall of Second Ward
Councilman David Malone?
Does
David Kuhn agree with Theodore Roosevelt who once said,
“The
only good Indian is a dead one?"
If
Cooper’s arrest was directed by Kuhn was this a retaliation
against Cooper for
helping stop David Kuhn
from digging
in
the Indian Cemetery on the County Home property on
U.
S. 52 West in 1986?
Written by
Austin Leedom on August 20, 2005.
NAMES OF RUSSELL
COOPER’S ACCUSER LISTED BELOW. Written by
Austin Leedom at 2:50 a.m. Saturday, August 20,
2005. According to news on Moe’s Forum the following
four persons signed affidavits that they did not sign the
petition that Russell Cooper submitted to the City Clerk on
August 3, 2005. According to our sources Clerk Joann Aeh and
Police Chief obtained affidavits from JEFFREY PRICE, DAVID
PRICE, SONYA CAMPBELL AND BURL BRAGDON. All four apparently
claimed they did not sign the petitions. On Friday, August 12,
2005 Cooper was jailed without warrant, without a court hearing
although the court was open and Cooper was forced to post
$10,000 bond for release. COOPER HAS NO CRIMINAL
RECORD.
However, the following criminal record was
found on JEFFREY PRICE: In addition to being sentenced to state
prison for breaking and entering in April 2000 according to
County Clerk of Court records, Jeffrey Price also has the
following record in Portsmouth Municipal Court:
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
11-02-1990 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9002437 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: OBST. OFF. BUS. Case Type: Criminal 2
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 11-02-1990
Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9002437 Docket Entry: Click
Charge: PERSIST/DIS. CO Case Type: Criminal 3 Concerning:
Price, Jeffrey D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 11-02-1990 Arr.
Agency: PD Case #: 9002437 Docket Entry: Click Charge:
DISORDERLY COND Case Type: Criminal 4 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 02-01-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
9100184 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case
Type: Criminal 5 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey D.B.A./A.K.A.:
Filed: 08/22/1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9101988 Docket
Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 6
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 03/02/1995
Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9500429 Docket Entry: Click
Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 7 Concerning: Price,
Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 11-28-1990 Arr. Agency:
PD Case #: 9002645 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DISORDERLY
COND Case Type: Criminal 8 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 12-05-1990 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
9002687 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case
Type: Criminal 9 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.:
Filed: 01-29-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9100156 Docket
Entry: Click Charge: PERSIST/DIS CON Case Type: Criminal 10
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
07/10/1997 Arr. Agency: OSP Case #: 9704264 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: INTOXICATED PED Case Type: Traffic Next
--> Prev Next --> 1 Concerning: Price,
Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 01-30-1991 Arr. Agency:
PD Case #: 9100171 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT
Case Type: Criminal 2 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 02-08-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
9100245 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case
Type: Criminal 3 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.:
Filed: 02-13-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9100274 Docket
Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 4
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
02-20-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9100301 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 5 Concerning:
Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 03-18-1991 Arr.
Agency: PD Case #: 9100467 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS
CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 6 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 04-15-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
9100719 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case
Type: Criminal 7 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.:
Filed: 05/29/1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9101216 Docket
Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 8
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
06/03/1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9101281 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 9 Concerning:
Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 07/03/1991 Arr.
Agency: PD Case #: 9101556 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS
CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 10 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 07/09/1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
9101610 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case
Type: Criminal Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 01-30-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
9100171 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case
Type: Criminal 2 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.:
Filed: 02-08-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9100245 Docket
Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 3
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
02-13-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9100274 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 4 Concerning:
Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 02-20-1991 Arr.
Agency: PD Case #: 9100301 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS
CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 5 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 03-18-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
9100467 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case
Type: Criminal 6 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.:
Filed: 04-15-1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9100719 Docket
Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 7
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
05/29/1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9101216 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 8 Concerning:
Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 06/03/1991 Arr.
Agency: PD Case #: 9101281 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS
CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal 9 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 07/03/1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
9101556 Docket Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case
Type: Criminal 10 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey A D.B.A./A.K.A.:
Filed: 07/09/1991 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 9101610 Docket
Entry: Click Charge: DIS CONDUCT Case Type: Criminal
<-- Prev Next --> Concerning: Price, Jeffrey M
D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 04/25/2001 Arr. Agency: PD Case #:
0102665 Docket Entry: Click Charge: SEAT BELT-DRIV Case
Type: Traffic 2 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey M D.B.A./A.K.A.:
Filed: 05/02/2005 Arr. Agency: OSP Case #: 0502862
Docket Entry: Click Charge: FRA SUSPENSION Case Type:
Traffic 3 Concerning: Price, Jeffrey M D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
05/02/2005 Arr. Agency: OSP Case #: 0502862 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: OPP VEH TRF VIO Case Type: Traffic 4
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey M D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
06/06/2005 Arr. Agency: SPD Case #: 0503976 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: FRA SUSPENSION Case Type: Traffic 5
Concerning: Price, Jeffrey M D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed:
06/06/2005 Arr. Agency: PD Case #: 0503976 Docket Entry:
Click Charge: FICT TAGS Case Type: Traffic 6 Concerning:
Price, Jeffrey M D.B.A./A.K.A.: Filed: 06/06/2005 Arr.
Agency: PD Case #: 0503976 Docket Entry: Click Charge: TAIL
LIGHT Case Type: Traffic <-- Prev
DAVID PRICE’S
record in Municipal Court has eleven (11)
entries. No criminal record has been found on SONYA
CAMPBELL and BURL BRAGDON. Portsmouth Municipal
Court records and Scioto County Common Pleas Court records can
be found on the Internet. Written by Austin Leedom at
2:50 a.m. Saturday, August 20, 2005.
Email from
James F. Stewart Saturday, August 13, 2005 I AM BLOCKED
FROM OBTAINING A PASSWORD TO THE FORUM, SO I WILL COMMENT TO
YOU: From your report of this incident it sounds
like Mr. Cooper has the best case ever against ALL the people
involved - KUHN, AEH, HORNER, THOROUGHMAN AND THE THIRD
OFFICER WHO ASSISTED IN THE ARREST. I will gladly
contribute to Mr Cooper's attorney fees. This rediculous
incident might just be the KEY to the downfall of the SOGP'
system. I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF ANYTHING SO ASTOUNDINGLY
STUPID AS THIS INCIDENT. James F.
Stewart / 911 29th St / Portsmouth (I am ashamed)
Ohio
UNUSUAL ARREST CONCERNING ALLEGED
CRIMINAL MISPRESENTATION BY NATIVE AMERICAN RUSSELL
COOPER. Written by Austin Leedom, Tuesday, August 17, 2005,
at 1:00 a.m. Russell Cooper is a well-respected,
lifelong citizen of Scioto County with NO PREVIOUS ARREST
RECORD. Many persons have questioned the urgency of Chief
Horner’s action to arrest and confine Russell Cooper without
warrant. The Courts were open at 10:30 a.m., Friday,
August 12, 2005, (a warrant could have easily been obtained) when
Mr. Cooper was taken from his home, searched, handcuffed and
placed into a marked cruiser while many of his neighbors and
friends observed. This incident has been described as a
Gestapo-style action. Chief Horner was not available
yesterday at the court for interview. One reason that
Chief Horner did not attempt to obtain a warrant may be that
Horner possessed insufficient evidence to persuade the Court to
issue a warrant. Three days later on Monday morning it
appeared that there was difficulty getting any charge filed as no
charges were presented to the defendant until 9:20 a.m.
Even after all the delay, the warrant was faulty in that the
name of the arresting officer was improper (Horner made the
arrest, but Captain David Thoroughman’s name was typed in as the
arresting officer;) also, the charge was signed by Captain Robert
Ware; Ware was not on the scene of the arrest. CITY
CLERK AEH HAS A LONG RECORD OF WRONGFUL TAMPERING WITH ELECTION
DOCUMENTS. Mrs. Aeh’s actions in this case followed
a predictable pattern. In 1996 when sufficient petitions
were collected to recall the entire city council, and the city
solicitor, in a case of grand theft from the city treasury, Mrs. Aeh
received the signed petitions, and then, instead of certifying
the petitions to the County Board of Elections, she gave the
petitions to the people who were being recalled to take back
onto the streets where many signers were persuaded or intimidated
into crossing their names from the petitions. When this
action by Mrs. Aeh and the elected officials was protested to
the Ohio Supreme Court the Court ruled 7-0 that she and the
others were guilty of “mutilation of petitions.”
This action cost $15,000 for an attorney to represent the city
in a losing cause, plus $7,000 to pay the attorney who won the
case for the citizens, plus the court costs of the
case. JOANN AEH IS AN UNINDICTED FELON, according
to the 1997 decision of the Ohio Supreme Court. Felony
charges were filed in Municipal Court against all seven of the
elected officials and Joann Aeh, but the Scioto County
Prosecuting Attorney never took action.
Joann Aeh, Solicitor David Kuhn, Council
members, Ann Sydnor, John Thatcher, Greg Bauer and Jim Kalb
escaped possible imprisonment because the County Prosecuting
Attorney failed to perform his sworn duty. This
Prosecuting Attorney was voted out of office by members of his
own political party in the primary election of 2004, largely
because of his inaction in this case. Mayor
GREG BAUER BOASTED OF FILING CHARGES ON ELDERLY MAN AND TWO OLD
LADIES, “I WANT THEM IN JAIL,” HE SAID. Also, in
this recall action in 1996 Joann Aeh allegedly found there were
minor errors on some of the petitions that were turned into her
by three elderly citizens. Misdemeanor charges were angrily
filed by the then-Mayor Greg Bauer. Bauer, an arrogant,
vicious tyrant, often boasted of filing the charges. After
charges were filed, Mayor Bauer carried the warrants to arrest
to Chief of Police Greg Ratcliff and ordered the Chief to,
“arrest these people tonight, I want them in jail.”
Police Chief Ratcliff did not follow the Mayor’s
orders; he did not jail the elderly citizens. He took the
warrants and notified the three defendants to appear in court
the following day. All three of the defendants, one man,
two ladies, were elderly; one has since passed away.
One
frightened old man came to court, entered a plea of guilty and was
fined One Hundred Dollars by Judge Richard Schisler. The
two women demanded a trial. Solicitor David Kuhn (who was
later under felony charges himself) never brought the old
ladies’ cases to court, and their charges were dismissed without
further hearing three years later, in 1999.
JOANN AEH HAS CREATED DIFFICULTY ON EVERY RECALL
ACTION -- LEE SCOTT In the recall actions of 2004
Joann Aeh challenged the voting residence of Lee Scott.
The Scioto County Board of Elections held a trial; they found in
favor of Lee Scott and overruled Joann Aeh. DIFFICULTY
CAUSED FOR CLAUDETTA FERGUSON - FALL OF
2004 In the recall of Ann Sydnor in the fall of 2004
Joann Aeh telephoned petitioner Claudetta Ferguson at night and
threatened Mrs. Ferguson with court action. Mrs. Ferguson
and friends appeared early the next morning at City hall armed
with affidavits disputing Joann Aeh’s false claim. Mrs.
Aeh’s apparent attempt to damage Claudetta Ferguson was denied
by Solicitor David Kuhn. AEH REFUSED TO ISSUE PETITIONS
IN 2005 When the most recent recall actions began Joann
Aeh refused to issue the necessary petitions; the citizens
presented their request to Solicitor David Kuhn in a special
meeting at Kuhn’s Office. He ordered Joann Aeh to issue
the petitions. AEH AND HORNER WORKING
TOGETHER The apparent close cooperation in pursuing
allegations against Russell Cooper by Clerk Joann Aeh and Chief
Charles Horner is intriguingly interesting.
KU KLUX KLAN
LETTER INVESTIGATED On Friday, August 5, 2005,
only seven days before Aeh and Horner conspired in Cooper’s
arrest, Chief Horner told Shawnee Sentinel reporters that he had
been investigating the authenticity of a 1978 letter that
indicated that Mrs. Joann Aeh, and her husband were, or had
been, members of the Ku Klux Klan. Chief Horner indicated he had
been in communication with David Duke, a Ku Klux Klan leader.
Chief Horner appeared to be very nervous and revealed
to the reporters that he was deeply concerned about civil damage
suits that are coming up in court against him.
WRONG HOUSE – DOOR KICKED OFF FRAME OF ELDERLY
COUPLES’ HOME BY HORNER’S MEN IN DECEMBER
1991 Chief Horner has had a plethora of damage
suits filed against him during his career. Violations of civil
rights have been charged many times against Chief Horner.
Horner was the leader of the Early Reponse Drug Team that kicked
an elderly couple’s door completely off the doorframe in
December 1991 on Harrisonville Avenue. They had a search
warrant to serve, but they attacked the wrong house. The
old lady’s husband was severely ill at the time; he later
died.
DRUG TASK FORCE CREATED - HORNER WAS
LEADER In 1992 Horner became the leader of the newly
formed Drug Task Force. He was the only leader they ever
had. The Drug Task Force was notorious for kicking in doors
and was charged with many abusive actions. Many times a
question of the amount of money, drugs and other items seized
arose. The County Sheriff’s Office provided some of the
men of the Drug Task Force. The Prosecuting Attorney’s Office
provided Rick Brown as the lawyer to handle the drug cases in
court. DRUG TASK FORCE FELL APART AFTER NEW BOSTON
POLICE SERGEANT POWELL BEGAN ASKING ABOUT THE SEIZED MONEY FROM
DRUG RAIDS The Drug Task came to a highly publicized
end early in 2003 not long after New Boston Police Sergeant Matt
Powell began asking questions about seized money not being
properly distributed; New Boston was not receiving their allotted
share from raids performed in New Boston. When the Shawnee
Sentinel and other media began making requests for public
viewing of the drug task force money records the Drug Task Force
self-destructed. Mayor Greg Bauer said this was a decision
made by Chief Charles Horner and himself. As Greg Bauer said, “We
were not getting enough out of it, we were not getting enough
bang for our buck.” With Portsmouth Police out of the
Drug Task Force the County Sheriff had no one to help with their
raids and they were forced to abandon the Drug Task Force
also. Sheriff Marty Donini was furious when the Shawnee Sentinel
learned of the breakup of the task force. During the
interview the Sheriff at first lied to the reporters about the
break-up and then said, “I wanted to keep it a secret… for a
month.” BREAKUP MAKE BIG NEWS -- DRUG TASK
FORCE LAWYER WENT SOUTH Big press meetings were held
with Randy Yohe of Channel 3 TV airing the news across three
states; the Portsmouth Daily Times and other newspapers made big
front news items of the breakup with photos of Mayor Bauer, Chief
Horner, Sheriff Donini and Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Rick
Brown. Mr. Brown has since given up a lucrative law
practice and moved to North Carolina, allegedly to be near his
daughter who is now allegedly practicing law
there. Many, many requests to see the complete records
of seized money, drugs, vehicles, weapons and other items were
ignored, or furnished only in part. The public has never been
provided the complete public records from either the Sheriff’s
Office or the Portsmouth Police. The Drug Task
Force was Charles Horner; he had been the leader throughout its
eleven-year existence. He had great success; he was a
zealous worker, but under his leadership the Drug Task Force
also gained unwanted notoriety. Because of Storm Trooper
tactics of invading homes of citizens, many residents of Scioto
County were more fearful of the Police and Sheriff’s Drug Task
Force night raiders than they were of regular criminals.
Many honest citizens were relieved when the Drug Task Force
disbanded. CHIEF REPORTED BARKING LIKE A DOG IN
CITY HALL In many
ways, Chief Horner has done a good job, but now he appears to be
fading and no longer shows the zealous ability of his younger
days. At times his faculties have been questioned.
On June 15, 2005 Reporter Doug Deepe at website
www.dougdeepe.com reported the Chief was seen and heard in City Hall
Offices barking like a dog. The Chief recently
underwent surgery and was still suffering pain on Friday, August
5, 2005. A week later he made the questionable arrest of
Russell Cooper without warrant. Perhaps the Chief
has been taking prescriptions for pain that are interfering with
his ability to function normally. I WAS CRITICIZED AS
BEING RACIAL IN MY WRITING. When I began these articles
on the Russell Cooper file I was questioned and criticized by my
supervisor for using the term “American Indian.” I was told I
was unnecessarily giving the incident a racial slant. I was
deliberately mentioning race. Sadly, racism is very much alive
in this and other areas of America. In my next article I
will explain why this arrest could well have been inspired and
committed because of Mr. Cooper’s “American Indian" race.
That is another story, too lengthy to write
now. Written by Austin Leedom, Tuesday, August 17,
2005, at 1:00 a.m.
CHIEF OF POLICE ACTIONS IN ARREST OF
COUNCIL CANDIDATE ABNORMAL, IS THE CHIEF HEALTHY AND
WELL? Written by Austin Leedom, Tuesday, August 16,
2005, at 2:30 a.m. Native American Russell Cooper, 42,
Former Law Enforcement Officer and Director of Native American
Security Agency Was Taken From His Home on Sixth Street,
Arrested Without Warrant and Jailed under $10,000 Bond by
Portsmouth Police Chief Charles Horner, on Friday morning,
August 12, 2005. Cooper Was Able to Post Bond Late Friday
Afternoon. On the same day, Friday, August 12, 2005
City Clerk Joann Aeh published and mailed a letter indicating
that the petitions to recall Councilman David Malone were
insufficient because Mrs. Aeh had found reason to eliminate
thirty-two (32) of the ninety-three (93) signatures that Mr.
Cooper had filed with the Clerk on August 3, 2005. Joann
Aeh further advised that Mr. Cooper could file supplemental
signatures to attain the necessary number on or before 4:00
p.m., Monday, August 22, 2005. Chief Horner allegedly
has advised the Portsmouth Daily Times and others that Cooper
committed six counts of forgery of signatures on the petitions he
had collected and filed with the City
Clerk. However, when Mr. Cooper appeared before Judge
Russell Kegley in Municipal Court on Monday, August 15, 2005 he
faced only one count of perjury. In a criminal affidavit
filed and signed by Captain Robert Ware, it is alleged that Mr.
Cooper had affirmed the authenticity of the signatures of four
persons who allegedly did not sign the petition. (Captain Ware
was not the arresting officer.) Mr. Cooper requested
that Judge Kegley continue the case until he (Cooper) had time
to employ a defense attorney. Judge Kegley continued Cooper’s
appearance bond and scheduled the next hearing for Monday,
August 22, at 11:00 a.m. Following the hearing on
the morning of the 15th of August, City Clerk Joann Aeh refused
to release any of the disputed documents. She referred
requests to the office of Police Chief Charles
Horner. More details tomorrow, stay
tuned. Written by Austin Leedom, Tuesday, August 16,
2005, at 2:30 a.m.
American Indian Jailed without
warrant by Police Written Friday, August 12, 2005 and
posted at 1:30 a.m. Saturday, August 13, 2005 by AUSTIN
LEEDOM. Portsmouth Police Chief Charles Horner,
Captain David Thoroughman and a police patrolman took Russell
Cooper, 39, of Sixth Street from his home without warrant early
Friday morning. Cooper was confined in the Scioto County
Jail under $10,000 bond. Chief Horner allegedly said the Indian
made a criminal error in filing recall petitions against Second
Ward Councilman David Malone. Cooper is a candidate to
replace Mr. Malone in the coming November
election. Councilman Malone has been criticized for
supporting the people involved in the Two Million scandal of the
illegal sale of the old downtown Martings department store owned
by SOCF/Martings Foundation Boss Clayton Johnson in 2002.
Malone’s popularity suffered when he voted in February 2005
to deny the citizens of Portsmouth the right to vote on
legislation involving more expenditure on the notorious old
structure. A recall vote against an ex-mayor in June 2004
demonstrated that the people were 2-1 against any further
involvement in the Martings building fiasco. At
6:30 p.m. today, Moezine Productions video recorded Chief
Horner as he attended a political meeting for Councilman David
Malone at Newberry’s Sporting Goods on Gallia Street. At
the meeting Malone said he was against “eminent domain,” was for
tearing down and then rebuilding on the site of the scandalous
old Martings department store. At about 1:30 p.m, today
the Portsmouth Municipal Clerk of Courts Office told The
Sentinel that there were no charges on file against Russell
Cooper; there was no record that an alleged crime had
officially been charged against Mr. Cooper. There are
questions as to why no warrant was obtained for the arrest of
Cooper, as the Municipal Court Clerk’s Office was open this
morning before he was arrested and a warrant was readily
available.. This arrest without warrant is a first for
Police Chief Horner who has failed to arrest many corrupt City
of Portsmouth employees and many white-collar criminals for
serious crimes during the past two and a half years he has been
chief of police. Russell Cooper is a former law
enforcement officer of good reputation and operated the Native
American Security Agency for many years. Some persons
believe that the arrest is not entirely racist, but fear the
Chief has been improperly influenced by un-elected big business
interests who do not want replacement of their selected
councilmen. Russell Cooper was released late Friday
afternoon after posting $10,000 bond. Mr. Cooper, a native
of Scioto County, is believed to the first American Indian to
run for office in this city. (Also, he is the first Indian to be
arrested when running for office in this city.)
Written Friday, August 12, 2005 and posted at 1:30 a.m.
Saturday, August 13, 2005 by AUSTIN LEEDOM.
FINANCES
REPORTED IN MAYOR’S PRIMARY RACE Written and posted by Austin
Leedom at 1:00 a.m. Saturday, August 06, 2005. Ohio
Campaign Finance Report By Second Ward Councilman David Malone
was filed on June 10, 2005. Mr. Malone reported
contributions of $1,366.94 and expenditures of
$1,119.92. He had a balance of $247.02 after paying all
his expenses of his campaign for Mayor in May
2005. Contributors were: Alan G. Barlow,
1062 28th
Street
$125.00 Michael Malone, 1731 Robinson
Avenue
220.22 Dr. & Mrs. William Josey, 2004 Waller
Street
100.00 Quincy Holloway, 6730 Kristins Cove Ln.,
Columbus 100.00 Marty Mohr, 1605 Lawrence
Street
100.00 Andy Glockner, P. O. Box
1308
100.00 Dan Childers, 930 Gallia
Street
50.00 Oak Hill Bank, 924 Gallia
Street
50.00 Fifteen Contributors @ $25.00
each
375.00 Thirteen Contributors @ $10.00
each
130.00 One Contributor @
$16.72
16.72 Total
Contributions
$1,366.94 Total Expenditures for signs and newspaper
ads, All paid to local Portsmouth
businesses
$1,119.92 Balance after paying all
expenses
$247.02 Note: David Malone reported a generous
$100.00 donation from fellow City Councilman Marty Mohr, of the
Sixth Ward. To his credit Mr. Malone finished with a
balance in his campaign account; that he did not spend more than
he took in indicates fiscal responsibility. Written and
posted by Austin Leedom at 1:00 a.m. Saturday, August 06,
2005.
MALONE FACES RECALL ON NOVEMBER BALLOT By
Austin Leedom, 12:05 p.m.,Wednesday, August 03,
2005. Signed petitions to recall Second Ward Councilman
David Malone were filed this morning with the City
Clerk. The recall will be a part of the November election
and will be no expense to the City, according to James K.
Wilson, Sr., Chairman of the Citizens for Responsible
Government. Many persons were disappointed with
Mr. Malone’s vote, (with Councilmen Howard Baughman and Marty
Mohr) in February 2005 to keep people from voting on the
Marting Building plans of Mayor Jim Kalb and Clay Johnson of
SOGP/Marting Foundation.
Malone continued to
support Kalb/Johnson by twice voting for an additional $500,000
property tax for 2006 for Kalb to spend on planning a move of
city offices to the old department store. On the third
vote, Malone switched his vote after learning Mayor Kalb already
had over $200,000 on hand for planning purposes; and, also,
nearly a dozen voters spoke at that council meeting in July,
speaking loudly and forcibly against more tax money for Kalb to
spend. Citizens were also angered by Councilman
Malone’s repeated “secret” meetings with Councilmen Jerrold
Albrecht, Howard Baughman, and Marty Mohr in the City Clerk’s
ofice prior to the regular meetings.
The four were
video-recorded, planning their votes in one of their “secret”
unlawful meetings, by Joe Ferguson of Moezine Productions.
This tape was broadcast over local websites. Malone has
publicly denied the video-recorded meeting ever occurred.
Many council-watchers have reason to believe that Howard
Baughman and Marty Mohr usually program Malone’s voting.
Mohr has boasted of having other councilmen “in his
pocket.”
Many citizens believe Councilman David Malone should be more
responsive to the people he represents and not be taking orders
from Baughman and Mohr. Mr. Malone’s reputation as been
severely damaged by his secretive actions in is council work;
citizens feel he should be replaced at the next election. By
Austin Leedom, 12:05 p.m.,Wednesday, August 03, 2005. Full House
at Council meeting MondayKALB UNABLE TO IMPOSE GIANT REAL ESTATE TAX
ON CITIZENS By Austin Leedom at 2:35 a.m. Tuesday,
July 12, 2005 In a third reading of a proposal to
burden citizens with a $500,000 debt Mayor Jim Kalb’s tax
increase was voted down 3-2 by Councilmen David Malone, of
the 2nd Ward, Bob Mollette of the 3rd Ward and Tim Loper of the
1st Ward after eleven citizens gave Council and Mayor Kalb their
reasons.and explained why they believed the tax was unfair,
unneeded, and should not be imposed. Council President
Howard Baughman and 6th Ward Councilman Marty Mohr voted for the
tax increase as they had voted in the first two readings of the
ordinance. Councilmen Jerrrold Albrecht and David Malone
had previously voted for the tax increase, but Albrecht was not
present at the meeting and David Malone apparently changed his
mind about the tax after hearing the citizens speak.
More details tomorrow.
city clerk denies citizens rights
Written and posted by Austin Leedom at 2:15 a.m. Thursday
July 7, 2005
The
City Clerk’s Office was crowded on Wednesday morning at
11:00
a.m. as citizens attempted to obtain petitions to recall City
Councilmen
Jerrold Albrecht, 4th Ward, Marty Mohr, 6th Ward,
David
Malone, 2d Ward, and Howard Baughman, 5th Ward. An
affidavit
to
obtain petitions to recall Solicitor David Kuhn was also filed with
the
Clerk,
Joann Aeh.
Last
week James K. Wilson, Sr. filed affidavits for petitions to recall
Councilmen
Marty Mohr, Howard Baughman, and David Malone.
City
Clerk Joann Aeh refused to issue petitions although there is no
justification
for refusal to issue petitions in the City Charter.
Mrs.
Aeh claimed that Mr. Wilson was not a resident of any of the three
Wards
represented by these three councilmen, and denied the issuance
of
petitions, although according to the City Charter, any citizen may
seek
recall of an elected city official and there is no right or
authority
granted
to the Clerk to deny such request. Joann Aeh claimed she
was
following the instructions of City Solicitor David
Kuhn.
On
Wednesday morning, July 6, 2005, residents of the 2nd, 5th and 6th
Wards
filed
new affidavits for petitions with Joann Aeh to recall the councilmen
of
those three wards. Mrs. Aeh indicated she would send the
affidavits to
Solicitor
David Kuhn for a ruling whether or not she would issue the
requested
petitions.
A
citizen of the 4th Ward also filed an affidavit requesting recall
petitions
On
Jerrold Albrecht, Councilman of the 4th Ward.
An
affidavit for petitions to recall Solicitor David Kuhn was also
filed by a citizen.
At
2:00 p.m. the citizens seeking recall petitions met with Solicitor
David
Kuhn
at his law offices on 6th Street where they presented Mr. Kuhn with
copies
of affidavits previously filed and approved that were identical in
substance
and form with the affidavits they filed today. Mr. Kuhn
indicated
that
he would make a decision by Friday, July 8, 2005 and would advise
City
Clerk Joann Aeh.
Joann
Aeh has a long history of working for the notorious un-elected group
that
has
long controlled the city government through hired, corrupt city
officials..
She
proudly confesses that she was a member of the notorious “Good
Government”
Gang
in the 1980s that wrongfully removed honest councilmen from office,
and
reportedly
once was an active member of the Ku Klux Klan.
Joann
Aeh was charged in Municipal Court on August 11, 1999 with
mutilating
petitions
after citizens had submitted petitions for the recall of Solicitor
David
Kuhn,
Councilmen Greg Bauer, Jim Kalb and other council members.
Mrs. Aeh,
at
that time,
in violation of the law, did take the submitted petitions and
then
gave
them to the office holders who were to be recalled. The city
officials then
took
the petitions back on the street to the people who had signed them
and
intimidated,
or otherwise persuaded, the signers to remove their names from the
petitions.
Joann Aeh then made a count of the signatures and declared there
were
insufficient names on the petitions to submit the petitions to the
Scioto
County
Board of Elections.
The
citizens appealed to the Ohio State Supreme Court. The Court
ruled,
(eleven
months later) that removing names from a petition
was
unlawful. The decision was 7-0 against the Councilmen, the
Solicitor and
the
City Clerk.
The
Solicitor hired an out-of-town attorney to battle against the
citizens in the
Supreme
Court. He was paid $15,000 for losing the case. The
private attorney
hired
by the citizens charged them $7,000. The City of Portsmouth
was ordered
to
pay both attorneys and the costs. Over $22,000 of the
taxpayers money was
spent
defending the illegal actions of Solicitor David Kuhn, Councilmen
Greg
Bauer
and Jim Kalb, and City Clerk Joann Aeh.
All
four were charged with felony crimes in Municipal Court on August
11, 1999;
their
cases were not prosecuted by County Prosecuting Attorney Lynn Alan
Grimshaw.
This failure to prosecute the criminal acts of the City officials
was
one of
the major reasons that Mr. Grimshaw lost in the primary election in
May
2004 as angered members of his own political party worked diligently
to
replace
him with another candidate, even though the Prosecutor was then
serving overseas in
the Iraq War as U. S. Army Major Lynn Grimshaw
Joann
Aeh is once again attempting to deny citizens their
right to vote.
Written and posted by Austin Leedom at 2:15 a.m.
Thursday July 7, 2005
THE MARTY MOHR SHOW
The Marty Mohr Show continues at City
Council. Sixth Ward
Councilman Mohr repeatedly attempts to deny
citizens the right to speak. While denying citizens their
constitutional rights, Mohr has used his position
on
City Council to advertise his business from his chair during
meetings.
Mohr operates “AutoMania,”
located
on Gallia Street; he sells boom boxes. Angered and disgusted
citizens have had enough of Mohr’s using his
position to advertise his personal business and his bullying
Nazi tactics to suppress citizens’ constitutional
rights to speak.
For the second meeting in a row Mohr, along
with his accomplice (Herr Howard Baughman,
an employee of Covert Furniture Store on Sixth
Street) has acted the part of a wanna-be Adolph
Hitler. SUNSHINE LAW (MOLLETTES)
Sunday,
March 13, 2005 T.C. Brown Plain Dealer Bureau Columbus
-- Teresa and Bob Mollette have spent $15,000 and countless
hours in the last year fighting City Hall in Portsmouth over closed
public meetings.
So far they've had some success, but the
battle is far from over. A Scioto County judge in November
agreed with the couple's civil lawsuit that accused City Council of
improperly deciding in private to pay $2 million for a former
department store that had been appraised at only $763,000. The judge
ordered a lien on the building and told the city to pay the
Mollettes' legal costs. The controversy resulted in a recall of the
town's mayor. The case is being appealed, and while the Mollettes
won't quit yet, they are weary. Ensuring public officials meet
in the open or release public records -- both requirements under
Ohio's Sunshine Law -- has never been easy. "I don't know how
much longer my husband and I can keep going," Mollette said. "But I
know in my heart what we are doing is right because they robbed the
citizens of Portsmouth." In recent years, the legislature and the
courts have tightened the grip on public records, carving out even
more exemptions to the law, said Tim Smith, a Kent State University
journalism professor and coordinator of the Ohio Center for Privacy
and the First Amendment. An Ohio Newspaper Association analysis
of legislation and court cases from 1991 to 2002 showed that a host
of information, once public, was exempted from the open records law.
The study prompted this dire conclusion: "If these trends in the
legislature and courts do not reverse, as we hope they will, the
future of government accountability in Ohio will remain perilously
in question." These moves toward more secrecy have prompted alarm
throughout the country, triggering a national effort by print media
to sponsor Sunshine Week to boost public awareness about the
situation. A recent survey by Investigative Reporters and
Editors and the Better Government Association ranked Ohio 41st with
a grade of "D" for its open records laws and access. Many
citizens seeking public records run into a stone wall and they lack
the clout, or money, to battle it out in court, making stories like
the Mollettes' so uncommon, Smith said. "Most people won't
fight," Smith said. "They go away or don't have the resources for
it." Last April, news organizations around Ohio sent out people
to gather records from government offices and school boards in every
county in Ohio. Just over half of those requests were granted on the
same day. That response was "outrageously low," said State Rep.
Scott Oelslager, a Canton Republican who at the end of January
introduced House Bill 9, legislation designed to toughen Ohio's
public records laws. "There is no real teeth in the law today to
require public officials to do what the law already requires,"
Oelslager said. "The public owns these records that are paid for
with tax dollars." The bill would impose fines of up to $1,000 a
day, depending on circumstances, for violations, and it would set a
maximum limit of 10 days for a official to produce a document. It
also establishes mandatory public records training for public
officials. The initial hearing drew skeptics on the House Civil
& Commercial Law Committee, who raised concerns over training
costs, potential frivolous citizens' requests and the impact of
fines on public offices. Some school officials also raised concerns
about setting time requirements, saying it takes time to review
records before they are released. No surprise, said Kent State's
Smith. "Every time an attempt is made to adjust the statute, people
come out of the woodwork," he said. "They say, 'As long as it's on
the table, let me plug in some more exceptions to get my piece of
information out from public view.' " So why is all this
important? In large part to keep the government honest, said
David Marburger, a Cleveland attorney who represents the news media,
including The Plain Dealer, in public records cases. "A lot of
the government becomes transparent, so sloppiness, laziness and
dishonesty among people in government is difficult to hide,"
Marburger said. "That keeps government relatively honest and gives
me security as a citizen." Marburger and Columbus attorney Fred
Gittes are representing The Plain Dealer and the Youngstown
Vindicator in combined public records cases now before the Ohio
Supreme Court. Essentially, the newspapers want photos of uniformed
police officers in their cities, but are being denied because of a
bill passed by the General Assembly in 2000 that blocks the release
of information identifying someone as a police officer. Both
attorneys fear the restric tions could get so onerous they would
prevent someone from getting the name of a police officer who helped
or hurt them. "Police departments are now using this to claim
that police officers are secret," Gittes said. "You're not even
allowed to know who your police officers are." The legislature
imposed the restrictions out of concern someone might track down a
police officer and harm him or his family. But Marburger and Gittes
said there is not one reported case of such an incident. "It
shows how the fear factor in American life has been used to destroy
some of the most cherished principles on which this country is
based," Gittes said. Concerns over security since the Sept. 11
attacks have clearly contributed to increased secrecy, said Frank
Deaner, executive director of the Ohio Newspaper As sociation and
president of the Ohio Coalition for Open Government. "It
unfortunately created a general paranoia that makes it hard for open
government advocates to push the pendulum back," Deaner said.
Another twist for open records advocates has been the liberal
interpretation of the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996, known as HIPAA. The federal law created
regulations to govern privacy of health- care information, but it is
being used to block much more, said Deaner. Information on
injured high school athletes is being withheld and some reporters
even have trouble gathering basic information from accident scenes,
Deaner said. Tiffany Himmelreich, public relations manager for
the Ohio Hospital Association, agreed there is a "huge learning
curve" in applying this complex federal law. "I can see how those
things would happen given the nature of HIPAA and it is confusing
and complex," Himmelreich said. "Hospitals are more likely to err on
the side of protecting the privacy of the patient and confidential
information." Efforts are under way to educate public officials.
The office of Attorney General Jim Petro in conjunction with local
newspapers and the Ohio Newspaper Association has trained about
5,000 public employees since January 2004. Of the many questions
asked at seminars, two common ones are, "Why isn't more personal
information protected?" and "Can a public body meet in private to
conduct work sessions?" The Mollettes of Portsmouth learned the
answer to those questions the hard way through hours of attending
City Council sessions and painstaking research of Ohio's open
records and open meeting laws. It was all new territory at first.
"I said, 'What in the world is the Sunshine Law?' " Teresa
Mollette said. Now the Mollettes, working with Petro, have set
up a seminar for their area at 1:30 p.m. Friday at the Clark
Memorial Library at Shawnee State University. In the meantime,
lawmakers need to give citizens more clout to be sure the laws are
followed, Mollette said. "The reason these laws are not working
is that the common person will not take the time and money to fight
the strength of government," Mollette said. "There needs to be
something out there to give citizens the right to get their records
so that things are done right. We need to find some way to get
relief." To reach this Plain Dealer reporter:
tcbrown@plaind.com, 1-800-228-8272
MARTING FOUNDATION HAS NEW
CONVERT
Written and published by Austin Leedom at 1:45 a.m.
Tuesday, March 1, 2005
An unscheduled ordinance for the benefit of Clay Johnson/(Marting
Foundation) was considered at the council meeting last night,
February 28, 2005. This ordinance was added to the legislative
agenda after the meeting began. The public had no advance notice of
this added item.
Public input by citizens to any items on the agenda was allowed;
speakers were granted only five minutes to speak. Many, many
citizens arose and spoke against the Martings/Johnson full-page
proposals published during the past two days by the Community Common
and the Portsmouth Daily Times. The speakers emphasized that the
citizens of the city were nearly 100% against accepting the Martings
building for any use at all. Then the police chief, who works under
the direction of Mayor Jim Kalb, spoke.
Police Chief Charles H. Horner revealed he is the latest convert
to the gospel of the further enrichment of SOGP/Clay Johnson at the
citizens’ expense.
Speaking for thirteen minutes instead of the five minutes
allotted to ordinary mortals, Chief Horner confessed he had been in
conference for two hours today with the Attorney Stan Bender, the
Martings Foundation’s chief proselyter to unbelievers. Apparently
Horner had "seen the light," and had been converted by Apostle Stan
to Clay Johnson’s belief that what is good for Clay Johnson and his
over-privileged band of disciples is also good for all the citizens
of Portsmouth. Chief Horner gave a cheerleader type oration
reminiscent of former Presidential Candidate Howard Dean. Council
President Howard Baughman permitted Horner to speak as long as he
wanted to speak in favor of aid and assistance to Baughman’s cousin,
Clay Johnson/(Marting Foundation).
Last year following his investigation into the fraud of the
Martings Purchase the Chief advised the citizens of Portsmouth of
his belief that criminal activity had occurred in the covert sale of
the old department store, (valued at $762,000) and sold by (Clay
Johnson)/Martings Foundation to the City Council and Mayor Bauer for
$2,000,000.00.
Tonight the "converted" Chief preached to an astounded audience
of infidel non-believers that he is now certain that there was
nothing criminal about this grand sale (theft). The conversion of
Chief Horner to the support of a gang that he tagged last year as
criminal is a "marvelous work and a wonder."
The chief advised that the citizens and the websites should stop
negative actions and words that have caused a divisive controversy
in the city. He advocated no need for the citizens to have a vote in
this manner; the councilmen should make their decisions and the
citizens should be pleased and positive about council’s decision.
The Chief sounded sincere in his belief that is best to allow Clay
Johnson to handle the citizens’ money. The Chief advised that a
forum be convoked early next week; the chief said he and Attorney
Stan Bender had already discussed the forum today in their lengthy
interview. The meeting was progressing well. Chief Horner spoke loud
and fast; with a suspect lawyer and an intimidating chief of police
who needs elected officials? Council President Baughman had lost
control. Horner was on a roll; he turned his back to the council and
talked to the common citizens. The chief, now totally in charge of
the meeting, further advised that the Marting ordinance be brought
before the council for a first reading now. The chief said that
citizens should be subservient and obedient to their elected
councilmen. Although never having served one day in military service
the chief cited the fact that our federal government sends young men
away to die in combat and urged, in effect, that citizens act like
"good soldiers" and follow the orders of their superiors.
Teresa Mollette, one of the many citizens who had earlier
in the meeting been allowed only five minutes to protest this
giveaway ordinance to Marting Foundation/(Clay Johnson) was denied
more minutes to speak by Council President Howard Baughman who is
tired of negative comments about criminal activity. He does not want
to hear it. Mrs. Mollette complained of Baughman' unfairness.
Richard Noel, a veteran of two wars then spoke. He
did not agree with Chief Horner. As usual Mr. Noel was
respectful of the council and others, but indicated he was also
against the Marting Building and against Clay Johnson/Marting
Foundation controlling our money.
Austin Leedom had not spoken yet; he arose and pointed out the
money that the Marting Foundation/Clay Johnson is holding was gained
illegally by the city and was stolen from the citizens in a secret
criminal act of fraud. Leedom believes we have had government
"for the people" controlled by white-collar gangsters operating
behind closed doors too long, and that the money stolen from the
people should be returned to the people. He seemed to be following
the ruling by the Common Pleas Court that was handed down in
November 2004 that adjudged the Marting Foundation sale "null
and void" because of violations of the law.
As suggested by the Chief of Police the ordinance was brought up
for a first reading and passed by 5-1 vote, with
Councilman Bob Mollette voting no. Council President Howard Baughman
then declared the ordinance had passed as the second
reading.
Written and published by Austin Leedom at 1:45 a.m.
Tuesday, March 1, 2005
MALONE FLOPPED, HAS JOINED SOGP
GANG, WHY?
CITIZENS DENIED CHANCE TO
VOTE
ON MARTINGS
BUILDING
SUPP0RTERS OF THE CLAY JOHNSON GANG TEAMED
UP IN SPECIAL COUNCIL SESSION TO KEEP MARTINGS BUILDING OFF BALLOT
––
At Council meeting last Monday, (two days ago) 2nd Ward Councilman David
Malone voted for citizens to be allowed to vote on Marting issue in
the May primary election.
Today Malone switched; he joined with
6th Ward Councilman Marty Mohr and 5th Ward
Councilman Howard Baughman to deny citizens a chance to
vote.
Read Story on DOUG DEEPE –
More details on this site later; entire meeting video taped with
sound …. Councilman Marty (AutoMania) Mohr making remarks about the
audience again. Also see photos and hear the vote -- by Joe
Ferguson on DOUG'S FORUM
888888888888
COUNCIL MEMBERS’
PHONE NUMBERS
FIRST WARD-TIM LOPER 353 3526
SECOND WARD-DAVID MALONE 353 0866
THIRD WARD – BOB MOLLETTE 353-0099
FOURTH WARD – JERROLD ALBRECHT 353 6950
FIFTH WARD – HOWARD BAUGHMAN 353-1406
SIXTH WARD – MARTY MOHR 456-6910
10:30 P.M. Monday, February 14, 2005
Written and posted by Austin Leedom
(By Austin
Leedom at 12:45 a.m. Wednesday, February 16,
2005.)
ATTEND THIS MEETING – IT’S
YOUR MONEY
A Special Meeting of the
Portsmouth City Council is to be held at 1:00 p.m. in the Engineer’s
Office on the top floor of the Municipal building on Wednesday,
February 16, 2005. Expect more treachery by Howard Baughman
and Marty Mohr.
Sixth Ward Councilman Marty
Mohr and Clayton Johnson (who is also known as the Marting
Foundation/SOGP) have made a backroom closed-door new "deal" on the
Marting building. Marty Mohr and Council President Howard Baughman
tried to beguile and bully this devilish deal past the other four
council members in Monday night’s meeting, February 14, 2005. That
did not work; Mohr and Baughman said they did not want citizens to
have a chance to vote on the deal; they were voted down 4-2 by the
other councilmen who had heard the voices of many citizens urging
this "deal" be put on the ballot. Even Mayor Jim Kalb said the
citizens should be given a chance to vote. The Ordinance was
tabled.
Mayor Kalb, believe it
or not, was then assigned by Council to meet with
Clay Johnson on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 to attempt to get a
"better" deal from Clay Johnson who is holding Two Million Dollars
he stole from us. Many people would think this is
unbelievable fiction. Here we are begging from the
thief who robbed us.
Tomorrow, you can expect
that the same ordinance that was voted down by Council Monday night
to be brought back and and an attempt by Mohr and Baughman to have
it passed as an "emergency." There is no EMERGENCY. This
FLIM-FLAM ORDINANCE is not an emergency; it is an attempt to commit
another crime of GRAND THEFT against the citizens of Portsmouth.
Clayton Johnson is an attorney; he knows the law. Think about it. If
there were any legal way for Clay Johnson to overturn Judge William
T. Marshall’s ruling against him why would he be holding secret
meetings with Councilman Marty Mohr and Mayor Jim Kalb to "make a
deal?"
The citizens of Portsmouth
hold the "winning hand" at this point. Don’t let our winning hand be
thrown into the discard pile for empty promises from a man who has
gained a great notoriety for himself and the City of Portsmouth for
creating the illegal sale of Marting Building in 2002. The previous
illegal act by Clay Johnson in the Marting building sale ranks of
one of the GRANDEST THEFTS in the history of Scioto County.
Make a deal with Clayton
Johnson? If we do, we will find ourselves eight to ten million
dollars worse off than we are now. If we ever get back any
"grants" from Clay Johnson the 'grant" money must be used in
renovation of the unwanted Martings Building or the Adelphia
building, according to the Mohr/Johnson "contract."
Clay Johnson, and only Clay
Johnson will determine how much of our money we will ever receive,
in dribbles, when he decides the amounts of "grants," and when he,
and he alone, determines the time when he will return portions of
our money in "grants" under the terms of the
Mohr/Johnson "deal." In other words, in this "deal,"
we may never get any of our money back from Clayton
Johnson.
Better to make a deal with
the Devil himself.
(By Austin Leedom at 12:45 a.m. Wednesday, February 16,
2005.)
ADELPHIA BUILDING ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FIRST
READING AFTER ATTORNEY MIKE MEARAN SPOKE TO COUNCIL EARLY IN THE
MEETING -
Mike Mearan spoke of many good reasons that the City
would profit for acceptance of the building. It was mentioned that
Chief of Police Charles Horner and other city officials had already
toured the building and agreed with Mr. Mearan.Attorney Mearan was
supported by a variety of common citizens who also pointed up the
wisdom of gaining the Adelphia building for almost no
money.
Former City Councilman Harold Daub remarked that he wished the
Marting Foundation had been as generous as Mr. Mearan’s
client.
88888888888888888888888
POLICE WITH METAL DETECTORS SCANNED COUNCIL MEMBERS
AND OTHERS BEFORE ADMISSION TO THE MEETING.
City Police Chief Charles H. Horner and two big, experienced
ranking officers maintained order in a friendly, efficient manner.
The purpose of the presence of the three officers was not
revealed. Normally Chief Horner is alone at the meetings. None of
the council members mis-behaved during tonight’s meeting. Sixth Ward
Councilman Marty Mohr, who disrupted the previous council meeting
with a vulgar, abusive, ranting outburst against the audience,
caused no trouble tonight.
88888888888888888888888
Marty Mohr, Sixth Ward Councilman, was accused of Intimidation,
Telephone Harassment and Public Verbal Abuse. These charges against
Mohr were uttered publicy and were presented in a letter to the City
Council Clerk by Teresa Mollette of Franklin Avenue. The lady asked
that the Police pursue these offenses; she said they were felony
crimes.
CITY COUNCIL
Lasted 3 ˝ Hours
NEW MARTING DEAL SHOT
DOWN
Sixth Ward Councilman Marty Mohr’s secretive deal with
Clay Johnson (Marting Foundation/SOGP) as proposed in an Ordinance
prepared by Council President Howard Baughman was tabled after a
lengthy discussion tonight.
Speaking to the council before the legislative agenda began Dee
Penix proposed that the citizens have an opportunity to decide on
this most devisive issue by having the issue placed on the ballot in
the May primary. She pointed out this would be no cost to city and
would put an end to the long, angry controversy of the Marting
purchase. Several other speakers agreed with Mrs. Penix, as did four
of the six councilmen.
Voting to table the ordinance were Councilmen David Malone, Tim
Loper, Jerrold Albrecht and Bob Mollette. Comments from these
four councilman and Mayor Jim Kalb indicated this ordinance should
be placed on the May primary ballot so all citizens may vote on this
issue. Solicitor David Kuhn agreed this would be feasible. Council
President Howard Baughman and Sixth Ward Councilman Marty Mohr
argued long and intensely against placing the issue before the
voters. They wanted the proposed ordinance passed tonight as a first
reading. When their plans were thwarted Howard Baughman and Marty
Mohr displayed the sad appearance of salesmen who had just
lost a million-dollar commission. Councilman Howard Baughman was
also challenged because of his admitted relationship to Clayton
Johnson.
(Written
by Austin Leedom at 12:30 a.m. on Monday, February 14,
2005)
"In our hearts we all know what is
right," …
By...C. S. Lewis, contemporary author of
inspirational books.
CITIZENS WANT THEIR MONEY BACK
WE DON’T WANT THE MARTINGS
BUILDING
TWO MILLION DOLLARS WAS STOLEN TO PAY CLAY
JOHNSON (SOGP/MARTING FOUNDATION)
Citizens of Portsmouth: You are about to be robbed,
again. Come to the Council meeting tonight and voice your opinion
about passage of an ordinance authorizing Mayor Jim Kalb to accept
an agreement proposed by Clayton Johnson of the SOGP/Marting
Foundation. This present action may cost you eight to ten million
dollars in costs for the renovation of he Martings building if you
allow councilmen to pass their proposed ordinance.
THIS LATEST MUGGING OF TAXPAYERS ENGINEERED
BY MAYOR JIM KALB, COUNCILMAN MARTY MOHR AND CLAYTON JOHNSON
(SOGP/MARTING FOUNDATION)
At the 13th of December, 2005 Council Meeting
both Jim Kalb and Sixth Ward Councilman Marty Mohr confessed to
holding secret meetings with Clay Johnson at his office and making
an agreement to a proposal for continuing renovation of the Martings
building. (Estimated cost is eight to ten million dollars for
renovation of a structure we do not want.)
The proposal by Clay Johnson is to return the Marting
building to the city and to possibly, eventually return, in grants,
a sum of $1,400,000 over a lengthy period of time for restoration of
the Marting Building. This return of the money to the city would be
in grants at the pleasure and decision of the Marting Foundation
(Clayton Johnson.)
The offer of Clayton Johnson (/SOGP/Marting Foundation)
reads in part, "Our proposal is that this grant would help fund
restoration of the Marting property and perhaps the Adelphia
building for public use. Our grants would be paid as construction
progresses."
No grants would be returned to the City except for the
restoration of the Marting Building, and perhaps the Adelphia
building.
IT HAS BEEN ESTIMATED THAT RENOVATION OF
MARTINGS WILL COST CITIZENS ANOTHER EIGHT TO TEN MILLION
DOLLARS
Neither the Marting building nor the Adelphia building
belongs to the city.
The city did receive title to the Marting building in May
2002 after the City Council agreed, in secret meetings, to buy the
building that was honestly appraised at $762,000, for the very
generous amount of $2,000,000.
TWO MILLION DOLLARS STOLEN FROM CITIZENS TO
PAY CLAYTON JOHNSON (SOGP/MARTING FOUNDATION)
No public comment was permitted by the Council when they
passed the ordinance authorizing the purchase in May 2002. It was a
furtive ordinance passed on only one reading, with no comment, with
no public imput or questions allowed. The required second and third
readings of the ordinance were suspended by council who voted the
passage of the Martings ordinance an "emergency."
JUDGE RULED COUNCIL ACTION
ILLEGAL
Title to the Marting property reverted back to Clay
Johnson (SOGP/Marting Foundation) on the 27th of
November, 2004 when Scioto County Common Pleas Court Judge William
T. Marshall ruled the sale null and void because of the secrecy
which violated the City Charter and Ohio State laws against such
deceitful legislation. The Judge also ruled that the City was
granted a lien of $2,000,000 on the Marting property.
TWO MILLION DOLLARS WAS STOLEN FROM
US
The TWO MILLION DOLLARS that Clayton Johnson received
from the City came from extra taxation placed upon citizens’ real
estate taxes. City Auditor Trent Williams can attest the money was
illegally raised. This money should be returned to the citizens from
which it was taken.
The sale of the building was illegal, the collection of
taxes from tax-paying property owners was also illegal, the payment
to Clayton Johnson (SOGP/Marting Foundation) was illegal. The court
has ruled it illegal. It was a majestic theft that will rank with
the greatest crimes in the history of Portsmouth.
This fraudulent action in the Marting case by Clay
Johnson and the City Council was overturned by Judge Marshall in
November 2004; in December 2004 Councilman Marty Mohr and Mayor Jim
Kalb successfully persuaded the City Council to pass an "emergency"
ordinance to appropriate money to appeal the Common Pleas Court
ruling. City Councilman Bob Mollette abstained from voting because
he had been a plaintiff in the suit to overturn the May, 2002
purchase. Councilman Howard Baughman, a defendant in the suit
did not abstain, he voted to pass the "emergency" ordinance
to challenge Judge Marshall’s November ruling.
Now, Councilman Marty Mohr has decided that the citizens
of Portsmouth deserve to be ROBBED again to further the prosperity
of Clayton Johnson. Marty Mohr, only eight months ago declared, "The
Martings Building ain’t worth anything." Marty’s changed opinion is
a cause of suspicion to the citizens of Portsmouth who voted former
Mayor Greg Bauer out of office in June, 2004 because of Bauer’s
participation in the Marting’s fraud. We citizens not only voted
Greg Bauer out of office, we voted him out by a margin of 64-36%. We
don’t want the Martings building.
CITIZENS HAVE VOTED, WE DON’T WANT THE
MARTINGS BUILDING; WE WANT OUR MONEY BACK.
Tonight our Councilmen have much to lose, and nothing to
gain, in supporting this proposed robbery. We, at the
Sentinel and Dougdeepe.com, have had rumors of
pay-offs and promises from "influential citizens" to some city
officials. We’ll print this if we can ascertain it is
true.
VOTING FOR ANOTHER GRAND THEFT FROM THE
PEOPLE CAN BE COSTLY IN MANY WAYS.
After the recall Mayor Bauer not only lost a generous
salary and many benefits; he apparently also lost most of his former
"friends." Greg Bauer has been cast aside by the same "influential"
people who used him to help them loot the city treasury in the
Martings rip off. "They" don’t know Bauer anymore.
Passage of the proposed ordinance to authorize the
present Mayor Jim Kalb to consummate this latest fraud by Clay
Johnson would be a Grand Crime against the trusting people who
have elected the Councilmen.
Gentlemen of the council, you can vote for this swindle
of the people or you can retain your integrity and reputation by
rejecting corruption; honesty is always an
option.
Once again, in this new Clay Johnson/Marty Mohr/Jim Kalb
proposed larceny there has been little public involvement, comment
or questions allowed by city council. A discussion of this ordinance
was to be done at the Council meeting held on January 24, 2005, but
no discussion was held because of an uproar created by the
injudicious remarks of a councilman who loudly abused his authority
and his audience while speaking from the safety of his council seat.
The meeting came to an abrupt end; no discussion was
allowed.
WE PEOPLE WANT OUR TWO MILLION DOLLARS
BACK
Below is a copy of the above-mentioned ordinance as it
appears on the Agenda for the City Council meeting to be held at
6:00 p.m. on Monday, February 14, 2005:
"Ord. authorizing the Mayor of the City of Portsmouth to
enter into a Grant Agreement accepting the offer of the Richard D.
Marting Foundation, Inc., to transfer to the City of Portsmouth
certain real estate and certain funds, in accord with a proposal of
counsel for the Richard D. Marting Foundation, Inc. as delivered to
City Council December 13, 2004. Ref. Pres. Of Council"
This ordinance apparently has been prepared and presented
to Council by Fifth Ward Councilman Howard Baughman; he voted for
the TWO MILLION THEFT in the purchase of Marting Building.
Councilman Baughman recently publicly confessed in council that he
is related to Clayton Johnson.
Citizens of Portsmouth. Come to the meeting tonight.
Watch how your councilman votes on this latest attempt to rob
you. This whole squalid affair re-inforces in my mind my belief that
the true test of honesty is what you do when either money or
reputation is on the line, and in this case it is both. Those
are defining moments when it comes to shaping the character of your
soul.
(Written by Austin
Leedom at 12:30 a.m. on Monday, February 14,
2005)
MAYOR KALB AND CITY COUNCIL VIOLATING LAW - PASSED
ILLEGAL ORDINANCE JUST LIKE THEY DID IN THE MARTINGS PURCHASE
- Bob Mollette voted NO, wouldn't break the law.
City Council passed an ordinance to renew a loan for
$615,000 during the Council meeting on January 24, 2004. This
ordinance had no previous public disclosure, was not listed on the
Agenda for the meeting, was never seen by the public, and the public
was given no opportunity for any input before Council voted to pass
the ordinance as an "emergency." This is the same infamous
procedure that was used by Mayor Greg Bauer and the notorious
"Crooked Council" to buy the Martings Building in May 2002. By Austin Leedom, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, January 25,
2004
Petitions will be
available
By Austin Leedom,
7:00 p.m. Tuesday, January 25, 2004
By a recall vote of 64% to 36% citizens,
on June 22, 2004, indicated that they did not want Mayor Greg Bauer
in office any longer. We have strong reasons to believe that
the secretive purchase of the Martings Building in May 2002 was the
main reason most citizens voted to oust the
Mayor.
Petitions will be available
for citizens to sign who do not want the Martings building to
be rebuilt to serve as a City Hall, and do not want the
multi-million dollar debt that would be incurred. This would be a
debt that would be paid by the city property owners who do not have
tax abatements. We will write more on this later, we will advise
where petitions may be picked up, or signed.
888888888888888888888888888888
- 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888
Sixth Ward Councilman MARTY MOHR, after
surreptitious meetings with CLAYTON JOHNSON (Marting Foundation,
SOGP) pushed an ordinance through Council in December, 2004 to spend
city funds to overturn the ruling of Common Pleas Court Judge
William T. Marshall that declared the furtive purchase of the
Marting department store in May 2002 illegal.
Clayton Johnson (Marting Foundation, SOGP) by court
order now has title to the Marting Building and owes the real estate
taxpayers of City of Portsmouth TWO MILLION DOLLARS.
Marty Mohr has been diligently working in the best interests of
Clayton Johnson. Mohr is attempting to undo the ruling by the
Court, and force the citizens into an additional possible
expenditure of five to eight million dollars more for renovation of
the Martings building.
Ownership and renovation of the Marting Building is
overwhelmingly opposed by most of the citizens of Portsmouth.
Mayor Jim Kalb who also again recently met secretly with Clayton
Johnson has joined Councilman Mohr in his efforts. Fifth Ward
Councilman Howard Baughman, (a relative of Clayton Johnson,) also
has supported Mohr’s program.
Fourth Ward Councilman Jerrold Albrecht's actions have indicated
that Councilman Baughman, Mayor Kalb and SolicItor David Kuhn
program Albrecht's voting before each meeting. Albrecht has
joined in the effort to assist Clayton Johnson.
Also, will someone please tell us about the NEW MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
that Councilman Mohr mentioned in his memo? Is this another
benefit welfare program for millionaires Neal Hatcher and
Clayton Johnson?
For more information on council meeting click on CITY
COUNCIL When this site comes up then
click on PACKET.
When this site comes up then
click on PACKET to see list of items to be voted on or discussed at
Council meeting Monday evening at 6:00 p.m., January 24, 2005. One
of the items: An attempt will be made by some council members to
raise the water deposit fee from $100.00 to $200.00 for renters.
This may be of great help to landlords who sometimes suffer loss of
dollars when renters move out without paying the water bill, but
would be a hardship on many residents at a time when they have an
added expense of moving from one residence to another. lst Ward
Councilman Tim Loper earlier made the sensible suggestion that water
customers be billed monthly to make payment of water bills easier
for persons with small limited incomes. Between quarterly
readings the bills could be estimated as some other utilities do.
The only cost to the city would be mailing expense, which could be
added to the bill. The City also would have use of the money on a
monthly basis rather than waiting to collect (or failing to collect)
an entire quarterly amount in a large lump sum. Also, payments by
water customers would be easier to handle for limited-income
residents plus any delinquency in payment could be noted and
addressed before the water bill becomes unmanageably high.
However, the suggestion by Councilman Tim Loper was not well
received by some of the wealthier members of council.
WARNING: The City of Portsmouth has been sued repeatedly by
citizens in Federal Court for refusing water service to new tenants
without the permission of the landlord. New customers at one time
were also being forced to pay bills left by previous tenants. This
procedure was wrongful according to Federal District Court. The City
of Portsmouth has expended large sums in fighting these federal
court actions. The City lost every case at a great legal expense and
has been placed under a special federal court contempt watch. In one
case the City Solicitor evaded possible federal jail time for
contempt only by the hasty enactment of a special "emergency"
ordinance.
This raise in water service deposit fees, apparently mostly for
the benefit of landlords, should be carefully considered. Enactment
of this legislation will create additional hardship on
limited-income persons and may result in more expensive litigation
for the taxpayers of Portsmouth. Could this raise be secretly backed
by big-time landlord/slumlord Neal Hatcher who owns 206 pieces of
real estate in his own name, according to Scioto County Auditor
records? Mr. Hatcher and Mayor Jim Kalb have spent much time
together since Kalb "ascended to the throne" of Mayor in July
2004. Look for Jim Kalb to openly attempt to persuade council
members to vote for this questionable legislation.
THE 'DONE
DEAL' IS BACK
President of City Council Howard
Baughman again did an excellent job of running an orderly and
informative meeting.
888888888888888888888888888888888888888
Ex-Mayor Greg Bauer is
still alive. His voice could be heard in Council Chambers Monday,
January 10, 2005, coming from the mouth of Jim Kalb who uttered
slick dishonest encouragement to City Council as he persuaded weak
councilmen to ignore the law and pass two illegal ordinances in a
give-away action to renew $100 a year leases for two boat clubs.
Some Council members voted to renew leases they had not even
read.
Kalb was assisted by Sixth Ward Councilman
Marty Mohr. After the give-away lease actions for the friends
of Mayor Kalb and Councilman Marty Mohr, Kalb then began
action to raise Garbage Fees for "the rest of
us."
Like Mayor Greg Kalb, Councilman Mohr also
has changed since he and Kalb began holding secret meetings with
SOGP Don, Clay Johnson, the man who stole Two Million Dollars from
the City in the Martings Scam.
Only Third Ward Councilman Bob Mollette
failed to fall for Kalb’s devious deceptions; he voted for the
people. More on this story coming as Kalb seeks to burden citizens
with 27% higher fees for trash and garbage; the garbage
cans and the trucks Mayor Bauer bought from Andy Glockner with an
unbid contract must be paid for. A possible raise in income
tax may be proposed.
Most members of Council are now voting
as Mayor Greg Kalb tells them to vote. Kalb is as fraudulent, phony and deceptive as Bauer ever
was. Kalb and Councilman Mohr also are working for SOGP in a
flim-flam operation to help SOGP Clay Johnson evade court
orders and keep the two million dollars he stole from the
citizens in May 2002 in the crooked sale of the Martings
building.
By Austin Leedom at 1:45 a.m. Tuesday, January 11, 2005
City Council Meeting, Monday, December
27, 2004
Monday, December 27, 2004
CITY COUNCIL MEETING TONIGHT 6:00 p.m at City Hall
The Mayor, the Auditor, the Solicitor and some of the
Council members would probably rather you do not attend.
Traditionally the city government doesn’t perform
their skullduggery well when citizens are watching. These devious,
deceptive devils have more "done deals" to do to you, and they would
rather you do not know what they are doing. Come to the meeting and
see and hear the City Council. Many of them won't appreciate your
presence, but it is your money.
A move is afoot by the Mayor and some of the Council
members to circumvent Common Pleas Court Judge Marshall’s order that
we collect our $2,000,000 back from SOGP Clay Johnson (Richard D.
Marting Foundation) who swindled us in the Marting Building
Purchase.
Again, the City of Portsmouth is in deficit. We are
$200,000 in deficit for this year. Auditor Trent Williams, (in a
Portsmouth Daily Times article on Friday, December 24, 2004)
has blamed council for the deficit, claiming the council failed to
levy more fees on the citizens this past year. Auditor Trent
Williams didn’t mention the no-bid contracts, such as the the C.B.
Hermann insurance rip-off, the no-bid $110,000 traffic light at
Fifteenth Street and other improper expenditures that he paid out of
the city treasury this past year. True, the old city council has
been responsible for many, many outrageous acts in the looting of
the city coffers, but their thefts would not have been possible if
the Auditor had done his job.
Come to the meeting; it is your money.
|